In our last post, we saw that based on the way Jesus at
the Last Supper, and much of the New Testament, connected the
crucifixion, Passover, and the bread and wine, we could rephrase 1Cor 11:26 as
follows: “For as often as you eat the
Passover bread and drink the Passover
wine, you proclaim the Lord's death until he comes.” But does this,
however, fit the wider context of Paul’s first letter to Corinth? To do this,
we will look at the immediate textual and historical context of 1 Corinthians
11:17-34, and then look at a number of the preceding chapters to see if Paul
was encouraging the Christians at Corinth to celebrate Passover to memorialise
the death and resurrection of Jesus.
As we look at the immediate context of 1Corinthians
11:26, it becomes apparent in that Paul is addressing believers who were gathering
for some kind of meal. That they were eating more than just some bread and
drinking a little bit of wine, as is typical of eucharist rituals today, is
evident in the way that Paul rebukes them:
When you come together, it is not the Lord's supper that you eat. For in eating, each one goes ahead with his own meal. One goes hungry, another gets drunk (1Cor 11:20-21).
Cleanse out the old leaven that you may be a new lump, as you really are unleavened. For Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed. Let us therefore celebrate the festival, not with the old leaven, the leaven of malice and evil, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth. (1Cor 5:7-8)
Here Paul is telling them to ‘celebrate the festival.’
Which festival? He told us in the preceding sentence; the ‘Passover’ festival,
of which Jesus is the Lamb. Now, one could argue that Paul is just being
metaphorical here about celebrating Passover, and that to celebrate the Passover
is to live in sincerity and truth. But as we can see, Paul is rebuking the
Corinthians for celebrating Passover without doing in their hearts what the act
of removing of leaven during Unleavened Bread was supposed to represent;
repenting of their old ways. Or perhaps he was just saying, ‘if you’re going to
celebrate Passover, do it by…’ But we don’t see that optional language there.
Consider, for example, if I told my child “go wash your hands with soap”, I’m
not telling him that he can wash his hands if he wants, and if he does; use
soap. I’m telling him, ‘you should wash your hands, and use soap when you do.’
Now, granted Paul’s focus is not so much to tell them to keep Passover, but rather
that they should do so with a purified heart, as represented by the removal of
leavened bread. Nonetheless, it does appear that celebrating the Passover was a
given. Thus, the content of chapters 5:1 to 11:22 is Paul describing what removing
the old leaven should look like.
This process of ‘removing the leaven’ is important for
all kinds of worship. For God, when his people just celebrate his feasts,
without any repentance, expecting Him to accept their worship is unacceptable.
One sees this back in Isaiah when God rejects Israel’s worship because of their
neglect of social justice:
Your new moons and your appointed feasts my soul hates; they have become a burden to me; I am weary of bearing them. When you spread out your hands, I will hide my eyes from you; even though you make many prayers, I will not listen; your hands are full of blood. Wash yourselves; make yourselves clean; remove the evil of your deeds from before my eyes; cease to do evil, learn to do good; seek justice, correct oppression; bring justice to the fatherless, plead the widow's cause (Isa 2:14-17).
To come back to the original question of this series, ‘how
are we to memorialise the death and resurrection of Jesus?’, the biblical
evidence seems to be Passover, which we in Modern English terms refer to as
Easter. We have Jesus celebrating Passover, telling His disciples ‘do this in
memory of me’. And we have Paul telling the Corinthians, ‘celebrate the
festival’ to proclaim the Lord’s death until He comes.
Does this mean we should
be all having a full blown Rabbinic Passover Seder?
No. That’s later tradition. They do however, provide
significant symbology that points to the person and work of Jesus. But even nice meal with the
basic elements of Passover prescribed in Exodus 12 of unleavened bread, bitter herbs,
and lamb (we cannot provide a sacrificial lamb because there is no Temple, but
I believe we can eat one as a memorial), and the ‘wine’ (however you want to
define that) of the Last supper, is a much more meaningful way to remember the
Passion event than some chocolate on ‘Easter.’
But didn’t Paul say
in Colossians 2:16-17 that Passover, and the other feasts, are now irrelevant
and unnecessary?
I have dealt with this more extensively in September Celebrations: Pointing to Christ,
but the short answer to this is that this passage has been often misread as
Paul says the full significance of the feasts in Christ is to come; future tense. But even if they were unnecessary, surely
the meaningful symbology and significance of Passover over and against
chocolate eggs should motivate us to do so. In the Passover, we remember our
Exodus from sin and death and how God through Jesus delivers and redeems us ‘with
outstretched arms upon the cross’ to set us apart as His special people, which gives
us hope of our ultimate final deliverance from Satan sin and death in the New
Heavens and Earth. And that’s just scratching the surface. Obviously, we don’t need the symbology of Passover to
reflect on those things, but the depth of meaning they provide, and the intentionality
and effort that goes towards preparing for, and the joy that comes from
celebrating a feast, I think, is worthy of the significance of what was achieved
in the Passion event.
No comments:
Post a Comment